Re: V-Maf Differences for Part #s

["Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>]

I've heard of this along with a whole string of other stuff that works,
TO some degree.
You can run a late camaro (TBI) on a 747.  But, it maybe illegal, in some
locations, but it will work.  The car ecm uses a IAT sender so might be a
little better in all temps.
Grumpy


| I have seen a 85 MAF put onto an 89 '165 TPI system with no apparent ill
| effects and was wondering just what the differences might be. the 89 may
be
| higher quality components or a more enhanced range or something?  I know
the
| 85 '870 used no burn off relay but when the 85 MAF is put on an 89 system
| the burn off functions correctly and has not harmed it.  It led me to ask
| just what exactly are the changes between the early V-MAFS and the later
| ones.  a curiosity thing - also it would be nice to know that if I see a
MAF
| on an 85 '870 car I can snag it from a yard or parts car.
|
| anyone else?  anyone ever made a voltage-to-G/S graph from flow data for
ANY
| MAF?
|
|
|
| > | There are differences in MAF part numbers between my 89 (voltage type)
| and
| > | say an 85 (voltate type) MAF.
| >
| > Yep.
| >
| > | Can someone tell me what the differences may be, generally?
| >
| > Assuming your taking about your F-body, it is also a different ecm.
86-89
| > take a 165.
| > Bruce
| >
| > | Is it the curve? the range slightly? significantly??
| > | no differences in the bore, and not the connector that I can tell.
| > | thx.
|
|
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
| To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
| in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
|

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org