[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?

To: gmecm@diy-efi.org
Subject: Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?
From: Michael Davis <davis@mail.eecis.udel.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:52:33 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:47:22 EST." <4.1.20000310114605.00a96f10@sword.cisco.com>
Reply-to: gmecm@diy-efi.org
Sender: owner-gmecm@lists.diy-efi.org

The latter..  3-1/2" dia. section of pipe.. (pictured at bottom of web page..)

In message <4.1.20000310114605.00a96f10@sword.cisco.com>,Ernst denBroeder write
s:
>Did you leave the MAF sensor installed when you ran the 730 in your tests or d
>id you remove it and replace with a section of pipe? 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?
  - From: David Cooley <n5xmt@bellsouth.net>

References:
- Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?
  - From: Ernst denBroeder <edenbroe@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?
Next by Date: RE: 4L60E Trans controller
Previous by thread: Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?
Next by thread: Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread