Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?

["nacelp" <nacelp@bright.net>]

Try the heater restrictor, works fine here in OH, and we getz some cold
days.  Gets oil up to temp., and min other wear related items.
   Where is your IAT/MAT sensor?.  Might take a hint form Scott...
   Soon as I get the GN back, a large intake neck, and bosse for a IAT are
gonna get welded in.
   Has any one tried comparing CTS/IAT/MAT/TTS response times?.
Grumpy


Crap... mee too, cept for the heater hose restiction as i need the heat in
the winter.  Hard to get enough with no underlay and the ext cab pickup cab
space..... there goes that idea.... i'm running a 195....seems to make the
best power and econ with it.  Burnt hundreds of chips in past few months
with a 195,-180 and 165 with diff calb on each.    Logged about 600mb worth
of diacom data..  Best drivability and econ was with the 195... gotta go to
the track to verify wot with the same chips.

-----Original Message-----
From: nacelp [SMTP:nacelp@bright.net]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 6:33 PM
To: gmecm@diy-efi.org
Subject: Re: 89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?

I have the wp bypass restricted to 1/8", and a heater restrictor of 5/16" in
the 5/8" hose.
Then drilled a 1/8" in thermostat.  Good 180dF thermostat and forget it.
Grumpy


<snip>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org