[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"

To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Subject: Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
From: "nacelp" <nacelp@bright.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 23:26:07 -0400
References: <4.3.1.2.20000504163448.00a7f4c0@mail.mafb.org> <3.0.1.32.20000504203545.009718d0@yyy.esper.com> <000701bfb62c$1facd560$70a1aace@computer> <3912333B.47FC144A@mail.techedge.com.au>
Reply-to: gmecm@diy-efi.org
Sender: owner-gmecm@lists.diy-efi.org

There was an oem application of the 165 as a TBI ECM, for a single injector
unit on the 2.5L 4 cylinder S-10 pickup truck, as I recall
Grumpy


> Has anyone used a '165 with Peak and Hold injectors using the INJSENSE
> input (D9)?
> Peter


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
  - From: "Swayze" <kswayze@bellsouth.net>
- Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
  - From: Peter Gargano <peter@ntserver.techedge.com.au>

References:
- 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
  - From: Rick Lindstedt <rick@mafb.org>
- Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
  - From: Kevin Crain <kevin@warpten.com>
- Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
  - From: romans@starstream.net (Romans, Mark)
- Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
  - From: Peter Gargano <peter@ntserver.techedge.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Turbo V6 Tuniing continued
Next by Date: Re: 1981 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham d'Elegance
Previous by thread: Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
Next by thread: Re: 165 ECM question, "single fire" vs "double fire"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread