Sure:-) Mike Rolica Plant A, Magnesium Products Division Strathroy (519)-245-4040 Ext. 265 -----Original Message----- From: Programmer [SMTP:nwester@eidnet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 4:12 PM To: gmecm@diy-efi.org Subject: Re: 4.6L Ford MAF was Re: Heat crazed mad scientist Made the same mistake--MAP sensors are freq'd and MAF's are voltage. Opposite of GM stuff. Nice to see some input from Mike...think we should start a FordECM site ? Lyndon. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Wesley <mwesley@mediaone.net> To: gmecm@diy-efi.org <gmecm@diy-efi.org> Date: June 5, 2000 7:25 PM Subject: Re: 4.6L Ford MAF was Re: Heat crazed mad scientist > >> Yes the maf is frequency only downfall it seems is the have no burn off... >> hence gett dirty and hinder driveability... > >Ford MAF's are all voltage output. > > >> Nother interesting tid bit... allmost all ford guy's transfer to maf because >> of driveability and power.. us gmers change to sd??? Could be just options.. > >One reason people switch to MAF is the ease of tuneability over the Ford >SD system and the range a Ford MAF (when tweaked) can have. The MAF I >run on one of my Ford engines can measure about 5100 Kg/hr of massflow >which is quite alot. You don't even really need to do anything to the >ECM, just pop in new injectors and the MAF and your good to go. > >Mike.... >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- - >To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes) >in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes) in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
<<application/ms-tnef>>