RE: BIG WinBin vs TunerCat discrepencies

[Eric Aos <EOA@spartek.com>]

I've seen this, and done it before. easy to get rows and columns confused.
and since most tables go from low to high... it seemed most natural to do
tables bottom left to top right... so sometimes lookin at it it's kinda
upside down.

as for how high the table is populated... depends entirely on what values
you put into the ECU file... I've seen files with just a few entries up to
close to 200 entries. Sounds like you need to verify that the ECU file your
using is correct. 

Eric

> The VE tables (both) contain the same values ... BUT IN THE 
> WRONG CELLS!!!!
> Has anyone seen this before?  It looks like the tables are 
> turned sideways.
> The values in the 20kpa column for rpms 1600-4800 inside 
> TunerCat are the
> values in WinBin for 1600rpms for 20-100kpa!!!!  What the?  
> Furthermore,
> TunerCat has this table populated to 5600rpms and WinBin only goes to
> 4800rpms.
> 
> This discrepency is also true with the spark tables ... but, to a much
> bigger degree.  The tables don't even contain the same values :-(
> 
> Does ANYONE know what is up with this?  FELP!
> 
> Tim
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without 
> the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to 
> majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org