So if it is maf.. obiously the maf is not right.. or you injectors are not actually putting out what the constant is in the prom...... Mike Rolica Plant A, Magnesium Products Division Strathroy (519)-245-4040 Ext. 265 -----Original Message----- From: Marteney, Steven J. [SMTP:smarteney@xlvision.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 1:38 PM To: gmecm@diy-efi.org Subject: RE: Changing 165 fuel delivery was "General tuning question - fuel economy" In other words, the block learns would come back to 128 (or wherever they settled.) Isn't that the goal? They are at 145-150 now and everyone says tune for 128. That's only one way I've thought of doing it, but didn't know if it was considered cosher. Steve (damn the excess overlap, I still want a blower!) -----Original Message----- From: Rick Lindstedt [mailto:rick@mafb.org] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 1:21 PM To: gmecm@diy-efi.org Subject: RE: Changing 165 fuel delivery was "General tuning question - fue l economy" Marteney, Steven J. wrote: >Congrats on a nice right up in GM High Tech Performance mag! I enjoyed >reading it. Hope it was you, guess it could have been another Rick Linstedt >that "tunes his own chips." Yuppers..thats me... =) Thanks! >On the injector flow rate, I had thought of telling it I had smaller >injectors than I really do. Seems that would fire them longer, but I'm in >the dark. Thought I would try it and see what happens. Yea..it might work @ first but I would think the ECM would slow them down to get the correct AFR after awhile of learning. ..maybe Im wrong here... Rick ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes) in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes) in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
<<application/ms-tnef>>