Re: MAF BLM based tuning

["Dave Zug." <dzug@delanet.com>]

Go figger... I can't tell if I crafted the wording poorly, if there was a
global "why the h...", or if it's just too cerebral a question?

I know, not worth an answer if it ain't MAP or LT1 PCM.

Turns out I think I can fake it using the MAF flow calibrations, but it
seems too much of a band aid. aaargh.

gotta find that 90 MAP IROC with the blown drivetrain selling for $1000. ;-)


----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Plecan <nacelp@bright.net>
To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: MAF BLM based tuning


>
> Gosh, the silence is deafening
> Grumpy
>
> > (This is for MAF '165 ARAP... 383 app)
> > Given that the BLM cell seperators are 13,21,34 g/s, and 700,1200,2000
> > RPM...
> > and as an example, say cells 6 and 10 show high values (160)  and the
rest
> > are fine (low 130's).
> > Since I have no VE tables to speak of,  What would be a good first step
in
> > settling the bad BLM's back to normal, without affecting the rest of the
> > good BLM's?
> > Please respond without using the word "MAP"   ;-P
> > Extra credit:  Anyone tried expanding or sliding the range that BLM's
> > affect?  like 13,27,40 and 700,1600,2800?
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org