[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MAF and 89 Vet stuff



Did you disable VATS?  Just an idea...

From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>
Subject: Re: MAF and 89 Vet stuff


>
> No codes, no start.
> Unplugged 9th injector.
> Reburn with early code, runs fine.
> OK, I'm open for *something else* but what?.
> Grumpy
>
>
>
> > I've done lots of 89 bins onto 86,87,88 memcal's.  If it doesn't work
> > something else is wrong.
> > Mark
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>
> > To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 9:10 AM
> > Subject: Re: MAF and 89 Vet stuff
> >
> >
> > > Since it just wan't me, guess then that's the way to do it.  Whoda
thunk
> > > Grumpy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I've had the same trouble. Burning an '89 bin into an '87 memcal
> > wouldn't
> > > > work. The ECM wouldn't recognize it and ran in limp mode.
> > > > Nick
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>
> > > > > Subject: Re: MAF and 89 Vet stuff
> > > > > In the past I'd just used a 89 memcal, and was fine.
> > > > > Last week had a car that I tried writting 89 code on a 87 memcal,
> and
> > it
> > > > > wouldn't start.   Would up editing his and he was happy.
> > > > > Make any sense needing 89 memcal to do the switch?.
> > > > > Grumpy

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org