Re: pfi & 747's

["Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>]

I know a guy, that was set in using one ecm cause he had soo much time
invested in it.   Was gonna use it for everthing.  Had it all nailed down,
But, he figures what the heck, I'll do another one.
Goes back to the first and goes what was I thinking, and then is even
sharper.
Kinda like rereading the archives,
It amazes me how often they are rewritten.
Bruce


> Yes, good thoughts at that, very much the voice of reason. . . I always
> figured the best way would be p&h's with a driver module. That is
> a bit of electronics just to stay with a '747. The other side is the
> knowledge base I have in the tbi ecm. At this point I'm actually
> considering staying with the tbi with bigger butterflies.
> BobR.

> Bruce Plecan wrote:
> > Very early in the DIY was a guy (Dale Ulan(?)) that posted, the
recommended
> > operating times of the P+Hs is 1-5 Msec, and 2-10 Msec for Sat..
> > I have yet to be able to disprove anything he wrote.
> > You can do alot of things, and kludge many things to get a system to
work,
> > but injectors types, and stategies don't seem to be one of them.
> > Like the ongoing 4 P+Hs in series parr. wiring.  Some guys claim it
works
> > just fine, yet when I run them thata way on the ecmbench you can hear
them
> > starting to lose sync, sound funny.
> >   You want to run P+Hs in a saturated strategy that seems to work, but
> > drivers are an issue.
> > Jus some thoughts
> > Bruce


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org