[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)

To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:19:01 -0400
References: <200009241913.MAA08368@user1.hushmail.com> <002501c026e9$ca5b7240$6ba172d1@jwn>
Reply-to: gmecm@diy-efi.org
Sender: owner-gmecm@lists.diy-efi.org

Avoid the headache, switch to a 730.
IMO.
Unless your switching over to a late model pcm, with a 3.5" MAF
Bruce


> Please let me know what you find out since I have an 89 Corvette that I am
> building a 396 for with a Super Ram.
> Jason Norris


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
  - From: "JN" <jwn@sgi.net>

References:
- Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
  - From: timsiford@hushmail.com
- Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
  - From: "JN" <jwn@sgi.net>

Prev by Date: 7747 vs 8062
Next by Date: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
Previous by thread: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
Next by thread: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread