[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)

To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
From: "Dave Zug" <dzug@delanet.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 21:30:06 -0700
References: <NEBBJKKMALFKOEIGMPFJEEBFCAAA.97005620@lambton.on.ca>
Reply-to: gmecm@diy-efi.org
Sender: owner-gmecm@lists.diy-efi.org

Missing TCC monitoring - or did I miss that in the '730


----- Original Message -----
From: Miker Rolica <97005620@lambton.on.ca>
To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 5:22 PM
Subject: RE: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)


> ive' switched to the 730... world of difference...
> can be done on a weekend.. tuning will take longer..
> 730 is just a much more powerful ecm, with more options available...


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org

References:
- RE: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
  - From: "Miker Rolica" <97005620@lambton.on.ca>

Prev by Date: RE: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
Next by Date: Re: 7747 tuning again
Previous by thread: RE: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
Next by thread: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread