Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)

["Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>]

It's in the DIY archives, was done after the 101 series.
Much shorter in lenght.
It showed the comparisions of each localation in the calibration area, and
how they varied,
Bruce


> Bruce where can we find programming 808 I've looked and looked but can't
> find it?
> Hopeing it will make interesting reading
>
> Daniel COlloins
> Downunder
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JN <jwn@sgi.net>
> To: gmecm@diy-efi.org <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 10:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of
255)
>
>
> >Never saw programming 808.  Where is it?  I would assume that is not
> >practical since so many here have switched to a 730 in lieu of the 165.
> >Jason
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>
> >To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:19 AM
> >Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of
> 255)
> >
> >
> >> Programming 808 covered that, and yes
> >> Bruce
> >>
> >> > What?  The 165 has the ability to use a MAP instead of a MAF?
> >> >
> >> > Jason
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Daniel Collins" <bossute@one.net.au>
> >> > To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:28 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max
of
> >> 255)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Why not use the 165 in MAP mode rather rather than MAF works real
> well
> >> > here
> >> > > in Australia 95% of our GM's are map
> >> > >
> >> > > Just a thought
> >> > >
> >> > > Daniel Collins
> >> > > bossute@one.net.au
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Marteney, Steven J. <smarteney@xlvision.com>
> >> > > To: gmecm@diy-efi.org <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> >> > > Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 9:57 PM
> >> > > Subject: RE: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a
max
> >of
> >> > 255)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >For me, it wasn't a matter of what was simpler, more eloquent,
more
> >> > > >accurate, ...  The simple truth I've encountered is the 730, 747,
> and
> >> > many
> >> > > >other ECMs (and more specifically those code sets that run speed
> >> density)
> >> > > >are more "hacked."  There is more info about them and more tunable
> >> > > >parameters identified and clearly explained.  Since I don't have
the
> >> time
> >> > > or
> >> > > >desire (lean toward the desire part) to hack the 165 MAF code, I'm
> in
> >> the
> >> > > >process of gathering the necessary parts to switch.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >IMHO, Steve
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >> From: "JN" <jwn@sgi.net>
> >> > > >> To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> >> > > >> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 10:58 AM
> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a
> >max
> >> of
> >> > > >255)
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > Really?  Isn't a bigger headache to switch to a 730?  Maybe I
am
> >a
> >> > bit
> >> > > >> naive
> >> > > >> > but it seems that 165 MAF ecm is fairly simple.  Right now my
> >goal
> >> is
> >> > > to
> >> > > >> get
> >> > > >> > it close and not perfect.  Since I know nothing about speed
> >> density,
> >> > I
> >> > > >> plan
> >> > > >> > to stick with the MAF.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Jason Norris
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >> > > -
> >> > > >To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the
> >> quotes)
> >> > > >in the body of a message (not the subject) to
> >> majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >> > --
> >> > > To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the
> >quotes)
> >> > > in the body of a message (not the subject) to
> >> majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >> --
> >> > To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the
> quotes)
> >> > in the body of a message (not the subject) to
> >majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
> >> >
> >>
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >--
> >> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the
quotes)
> >> in the body of a message (not the subject) to
majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> >in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org