Re: Call for standards: EPROM/cal editing

["Daniel Collins" <bossute@one.net.au>]

I had the exact opposite experience with Tunercat I did buy it to try it out
and when I talked to them they were willing to make a definition file for it
$5D - still coming but I doubt they will go to the extent  Peters .ECU file
seems to - if we could edit the TDF definitions I think it would be a big
plus.
Have you approached Tunercat requesting  a editor ?

I am sure none of us mind paying a moderate price for work that other people
have invested in doing the hard work which is why I bought Tunercat to try
even though at the time I did not a use for it - since started my LT1
conversion so it has come in handy.




>Re the TunerCat TDF editor, the problem with this for me is I can see
>TunerCat is a great program and would certainly consider buying it, however
>he does not have a TDF for my application, nor would he ever develop one I
>would think.
>I know the locations of things and would be more than willing to punch them
>all in to a TDF. Maybe if this editor was also for sale?.
>
>Ross Myers
>
Daniel Collins
Way Downunder

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org