RE: Changing 165 fuel delivery was "General tuning question - fue l economy"

["Marteney, Steven J." <smarteney@xlvision.com>]

In other words, the block learns would come back to 128 (or wherever they
settled.)  Isn't that the goal?  They are at 145-150 now and everyone says
tune for 128.  That's only one way I've thought of doing it, but didn't know
if it was considered cosher.

Steve (damn the excess overlap, I still want a blower!)

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Lindstedt [mailto:rick@mafb.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 1:21 PM
To: gmecm@diy-efi.org
Subject: RE: Changing 165 fuel delivery was "General tuning question -
fue l economy"


Marteney, Steven J. wrote:
>Congrats on a nice right up in GM High Tech Performance mag!  I enjoyed
>reading it.  Hope it was you, guess it could have been another Rick
Linstedt
>that "tunes his own chips."

Yuppers..thats me... =) Thanks!

>On the injector flow rate, I had thought of telling it I had smaller
>injectors than I really do.  Seems that would fire them longer, but I'm in
>the dark.  Thought I would try it and see what happens.

Yea..it might work @ first but I would think the ECM would slow them down 
to get the correct AFR after awhile of learning. ..maybe Im wrong here...

Rick

  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org