|
I understood your original post's question, it was
a question about why it looks like some are treated one way and others are
treated differently. harmless enough question but I thought others may have
interpreted it another way (they did)
My responce was aimed at those who read it wrong,
if you can follow that.
It also gave me a change to say terry's product and
virtue is all good.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 9:07
AM
Subject: Re: Call for standards:
EPROM/cal editing
In a message dated 11/04/2000 10:10:58 AM Eastern
Standard Time,
EOA@spartek.com
writes:
I don't begrudge Terry for charging for his work. Writing the
software is
easy compared to dissecting the bin's to get the correct
data locations. I
also wouldn't expect a commercial package to adhere to
a universal standard
for ECU files, that is their lifeblood. It would be
nice if the free editors
did though (That is why we write them isn't it?
to share?) or at least
provide a means for translating from one to the
other...
OK, well now that another of my posts has been
grossly misunderstood, I'll
simply say that I am all for Terry K or anyone
else being able to sell what
they have designed for a profit. I have
apologized to Terry off list for
inadvertently dragging his name into
this.
JW
|