Re: Sensor response times; was 89 F-body ECU

["nacelp" <nacelp@bright.net>]

Is it a thread in (pipe thread?), or one that uses a clip to hold it in?.
Grumpy


> I grabbed one of those small IAT sensors too. It was out of the airbox of
an
> 88 Quad 4, and the sensor side was smaller than an SMD cap. But it looked
> factory.
> I thought I would try it in place of my 89 OEM TPI sensor, which is
encased
> in brass. Haven't tested it yet though.
> Tom
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scot Sealander" <Sealand@clarityconnect.com>
> To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 1:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Sensor response times; was 89 F-body ECU
>
>
> > nacelp wrote:
> >
> > > Has any one tried comparing CTS/IAT/MAT/TTS response times?.
> >
> > Not yet.  But one day while looking for sensors at the junkward,
> > I came across what must be an aftermarket air temp sensor.
> > It was made a little different from the GM sensors.  It reads
> > the same, but has a very small element for the thermister.
> >
> > Now I am assuming that the small element means less thermal
> > mass (faster response), but I may be wrong....
> >
> > Just have to test some.
> >
> > Scot Sealander
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> > in the body of a message (not the subject) to
majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org